Finished prints weren’t worth the wait, either, with poor colour rendition and tone. You may also like. I absolutely love this printer. The X is also rated to perform more quickly than the X, so the focus this review will be on performance since the two printers are so similar otherwise. Casual home users who value network-readiness will love that feature, but users who want better print quality will be happier with a different machine.

Uploader: Tygokree
Date Added: 27 June 2011
File Size: 62.93 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 51132
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Best Printers for We’ve changed, we promise. And color blocks showed very faint horizontal striations. Don’t show this again. It is very easy to use and works better than any other printer I have owned.

Lexmark X All-in-one Inkjet Printer | eBay

Scanning is an equally lacklustre affair and while there’s a built-in media card reader, there’s no colour LCD, so you have to print off an index sheet of images before you can even choose which photos you want to print.

But if your focus is on print quality, check out the Canon Pixma MP Its main claim to fame is that it’s fully Wi-Fi compatible straight out of the box, and in our tests this proved quick and easy to set up. The XP “Small-in-One” printer turns in high scores for print quality, a versatile Canon Pixma MP Good. Charles Pelissier Verified purchase: Overall, the Lexmark X produces mediocre prints and is a bit slow cano tasks other than text printing.


Mark Zuckerberg on Facebook’s CNET Labs’ inkjet multifunction speed tests cznon per minute Longer bars indicate better performance. Using the standard capacity ink cartridges supplied with the printer, ink costs are fiendishly expensive, at over 5p per mono print and nearly 12p for colour.

Trending Price New.

Skip to main content. Details need to be sharpened, and we saw evidence of graininess and horizontal striations, though they weren’t as evident as what we saw in the graphics prints. Even worse was its photo print speed: Show More Show Less.

I would highly recommend this printer to all. Copy photos, black and white or color documents with the touch of one button.

It was soundly trounced, too, in 4×6 photo prints. A business card was jamed under the paper jam switch after removing the card there were no more problems. The X did its best work with the color scan: Finished prints weren’t worth the wait, either, with poor colour rendition and tone. Canon Pixma MP 5.


Lexmark X4550 All-in-one Inkjet Printer

If you’re a casual home user who prioritizes network-readiness, the Lexmark X is a bargain. I love it because it works on I print a lot of things! Considering that Lexmark is such a big name in the world of business printing, the X feels surprisingly flimsy, with a build quality that doesn’t seem to match the competition. Additionally, we saw a lot of jagged edges and wicking, even though we printed on Lexmark’s premium paper.

Our Verdict Wi-Fi is nice, but x45550 is poor. It has great print quality and prints out documents and photos very quickly. Straight edges showed jaggedness instead of clean, sharp lines. The Bad Text, graphics, and photo printing need improvement; very slow 4×6 photo prints.

However i dislike the idea that it does not fax.